In October, I was lucky enough to spend three weeks in the United States, attending a meeting of The Conversation’s global network of editions in Providence, Rhode Island, and a conference at Columbia University in New York on the US election coverage and journalism’s uncertain future.
A few things stood out for me. The academics and heavy hitters at the Columbia University conference were all deeply worried about misinformation and all were supporters of Democrat candidate Kamala Harris. Everyone I talked to nervously predicted that she would win.
The fact that they turned out to be so out of tune with the electorate speaks volumes about the fragmented media ecosystem in the US. Is it any wonder that readers of the New York Times and fans of Joe Rogan’s podcast or Fox News have divergent sets of facts and utterly different worldviews? The media is increasingly partisan, so much so that what you consume is a reliable predictor of what you believe.
The second thing that left an impression on me was a talk by the media academic Ethan Zuckerman. Not long before the January 6 insurrection he published a book in which he divided the political world into “insurrectionists” and “institutionalists”.
The insurrectionists want to achieve change by tearing things down. Think “drain the swamp” Trump supporters and the Black Lives Matter movement. Institutionalists want to do the slow work of trying to achieve change from inside the system.
According to Zuckerman both approaches are valid, but the social media algorithms reward the howl of rage over the quiet diligence of the dedicated bureaucrat every time.
It got me thinking about The Conversation, and where our model of informing democracy with journalism by experts might fit in. The howl of rage has a place in the face of great injustice, but I think that deep down we are institutionalists, engaged in the slow and painstaking work of bringing people together and creating a non-partisan space for respectful discussion.
And that is why support from civic-minded donors like you is so vital. Your contributions enable us to maintain our editorial independence, allowing us to make informed decisions about how best to share high-quality information with everyone. We are constantly trying to improve, which is why the findings from The Conversation’s Reader Survey make essential reading (read more).
It's terrific to see that so many of you are using The Conversation to make a positive difference in the world. Our mission has always been to provide the information that leads to better decisions, and it’s fantastic to see this ambition realised in the world.
Thank you again for reading, sharing and supporting our work.
Best wishes,
Misha Ketchell, Editor
P.S If you’d like to learn more about how our team make their editorial decisions, please join us online for a Conversation news conference and see our team in action. This special event is exclusively for our supporters. Held 9am AEST on Monday 25 November 2024, it’s free to attend and you’ll get an inside look at how we plan our coverage, analyse the news, and tackle complex editorial decisions. Further info below.
Want to know how our work is informing decisions?
The Conversation collects feedback from our authors and uses analytics to track the post-publication impact of our work. From engagement with policy makers to supporting educators our articles are providing quality information that informs decisions.
- To learn more, please visit our audience and impact page and read our quarterly reports.
- Read Latest Impact Report
Thank you for including us in your legacy
Last month as part of the Australian Charities nationwide giving campaign ‘Include a Charity’, we asked our readers to consider including a gift to The Conversation in their Will. We were humbled that many of you were interested in learning more and several of you told us that you had included The Conversation in this significant stage of giving.
A heartfelt thank you to those of you have taken this step (including those who have chosen to do this anonymously). It will make the world of difference in safeguarding our future.
If you would like to know more please email our bequest manager Helen Johnstone or read more.
'I believe truth in journalism is the single most important thing if we want to keep democracy alive in the toxic times of “alternative facts” and radically divisive politics.'Helmut Schwabe, Legacy Supporter
Thank you for being a Friend of The Conversation
- Make a donation to show your support for independent journalism
We acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the First Peoples of Australia and Māori as tangata whenua in Aotearoa New Zealand.